Showing posts with label fossil fuel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fossil fuel. Show all posts

Thursday, April 17, 2014

Publication: Practical Implications of Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform for the Energy Supply Chain in Indonesia (12 April 2014)

IISD Publications Centre

Practical Implications of Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform for the Energy Supply Chain in Indonesia

» David Braithwaite, IISD, 2014.Paper, 9 pages, copyright: IISD
PDF
  • Hard copy not available.

This briefing note examines the practical short-term implications for Indonesia’s energy supply chain of steps towards fossil-fuel subsidy reform. What impacts were witnessed following recent gasoline and diesel price hikes in June 2013? What might we expect in the future? What does this mean for the planning of more comprehensive, long-term fossil-fuel subsidy reform?

see more : http://www.iisd.org/publications/pub.aspx?pno=2920

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Publication: The Future of Social Welfare Programs in Indonesia: From Fossil-Fuel Subsidies to Better Social Protection (11 April 2014)

IISD Publications Centre

The Future of Social Welfare Programs in Indonesia: From Fossil-Fuel Subsidies to Better Social Protection

» Ari Perdana, IISD, 2014.Paper, 15 pages, copyright: IISD
PDF
  • Hard copy not available.

This briefing note examines the relationship between fossil-fuel subsidies and Indonesia’s broader policy interventions to promote social welfare. Traditionally, Indonesia has used fossil-fuel subsidies to help alleviate poverty and to control inflation. However, over time, this policy has grown increasingly expensive. It has also been criticized for being inefficient and regressive, given that the rich enjoy a greater proportion of the benefits than the poor. This paper reviews the evidence to explore two contrary beliefs: on the one hand, that fossil-fuel subsidies cannot be reduced because this would harm the poor; and, on the other hand, that reforming fuel subsidies is in fact fundamental to the improvement of social welfare policy in Indonesia. Who is right? What are Indonesia’s ambitions to improve social welfare and how do fossil-fuel subsidies fit in?

see more: http://www.iisd.org/publications/pub.aspx?pno=2921

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Publication: Understanding Fossil-fuel Subsidies in India: Questions and answers (29 Feb 2014)

IISD Publications Centre

Understanding Fossil-fuel Subsidies in India: Questions and answers

» , Virginia Benninghoff, Shruti Sharma, Damon Vis-Dunbar, IISD, 2014.Paper, 24 pages, copyright: IISD
Fossil-fuel subsidies are significant drain on public finances. They are also bad for the environment, while benefitting higher income consumers more than poorer ones. This comic book provides an accessible and fun introduction to fossil-fuel subsidies in India. It details how the subsidies work, their impacts on people and the economy, and what the Indian government is doing to change these policies.

PDF
  • Hard copy not available.

Thursday, February 20, 2014

Singapore News: Oil Spillage Clean-up Operations (7 Feb 2014)

News Releases

Oil Spillage Clean-up Operations – Final Update

JOINT NEWS RELEASE BETWEEN MPA, SDC AND NEA
Singapore, 7 February 2014 - Following the collision between chemical tanker, "Lime Galaxy" and containership, "Feihe", on 29 January and collision between containership, "NYK Themis" and barge "AZ Fuzhou", on 30 January 2014, the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) has worked with its partners from various agencies and the industry to contain and clean up the bunker fuel oil spilled.
Containership “Feihe” spilled about 280 metric tonnes (mt) of fuel oil, while containership “NYK Themis” spilled about 400mt of fuel oil as a result of the collisions.
As of 7 February 2014, a total of 40 craft, two skimmers, two harbour busters, more than 1000 metres of containment boom and more than 400 personnel were deployed by MPA and oil spill response companies as part of the containment and clean-up efforts at sea.
Since 3 February 2014, no oil patches have been reported in our waters. MPA will continue to monitor our waters closely and carry out any necessary clean up.
Sentosa Development Corporation is completing clean-up works on the beaches of Kusu and St John’s Islands and co-operating with the National Environment Agency (NEA) to ensure the surrounding waters are free from oil pollution. The islands remain open, but the public are advised to keep away from the areas on the beaches affected by the oil spill. Signage are located on the beaches to inform and guide the public. NEA will continue to monitor these beaches and will inform the public when the currently closed parts of these beaches are re-opened.
NEA is also working closely with the National Parks Board and the Singapore Land Authority on the clean-up efforts at Pulau Semakau and will provide more updates when the operations are completed.
MPA would like to record its appreciation to the following organisations for their invaluable assistance:

  • Agri-Food & Veterinary Authority of Singapore
  • Centre for Remote Imaging, Sensing and Processing (NUS)
  • International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Limited
  • Ministry of Defence
  • National Environment Agency
  • National Parks Board
  • Oil Spill Response Ltd
  • Public Utilities Board
  • Republic of Singapore Air Force
  • Republic of Singapore Navy
  • Semco Salvage & Towage Pte Ltd
  • Sentosa Development Corporation
  • Shell Eastern Petroleum (Pte) Ltd
  • Singapore Salvage Engineers Pte Ltd
  • SMIT Singapore Pte Ltd
  • SPICA Services (S) Pte Ltd
  • Svitzer Salvage Asia Pte Ltd
  • Tian San Shipping Pte Ltd
  • Masters and crew of ships that reported sightings of oil patches

  • - See more at: http://app2.nea.gov.sg/corporate-functions/newsroom/news-releases/oil-spillage-clean-up-operations-final-update#sthash.zXmJYJAj.dpuf

    Wednesday, February 19, 2014

    Publication: Recent Developments in Sudan’s Fuel Subsidy Reform Process (24 Feb 2014)

    IISD Publications Centre

    Recent Developments in Sudan’s Fuel Subsidy Reform Process

    » Laura James, IISD, 2014.Paper, 19 pages, copyright: IISD
    In September 2013 Sudan introduced the third and most dramatic in a series of fuel subsidy cuts, raising prices of petrol, diesel and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) by 65 to 75 per cent each. This came in a context of high economic pressure, following the loss of oil revenue from South Sudan after July 2011. That resulted in significant structural imbalances in the fiscal and current accounts, sending the black market exchange rate out of control and requiring the Central Bank to print money to finance excessive government spending.

    The overall pricing system was not changed by the subsidy cuts, and no explicit linkage to the market was introduced, meaning that further reforms are likely to be required. However, that may be politically difficult, given the highly negative public reaction (with the worst riots seen in the capital city for at least two decades) and the lack of support for the reforms among the media and other political forces—including sections of the ruling party itself. Internal disunity appears to have been one of the main factors preventing the government from launching an effective communications strategy and broader consultations.

    PDF
    • Hard copy not available.

    South Korean News: Fuel ration seems to have been dismantled in N. Korea: report (03 Feb 2014)

    Fuel ration seems to have been dismantled in N. Korea: report
    Uploaded-byadmin ()
    Date2014-02-03
    Acess90

    SEOUL, Feb. 3 (Yonhap) -- A fuel ration system in North Korea seems to have been dismantled due to a chronic fuel shortage, a report said Monday.

    The report by the state-run Korea Energy Economics Institute (KEEI) said a majority of households in North Korea secure their fuel for heating and cooking on the black market or by themselves, hinting that the country's fuel ration system might have been scrapped.

    The report was made on the basis of data compiled from a poll of 350 North Korean defectors who fled the country after 2011.

    According to the report, 51.1 percent of the North's households bought their heating and cooking fuel on the market, with 42 percent gathering their fuel, such as firewood, by themselves.

    Only 6.8 percent of them were provided with fuel for heating and cooking through the country's fuel ration channel.

    The energy consumption of a North Korean household was estimated at 0.291 tons of oil equivalent (TOE) as of 2011. The TOE is a unit of energy which is equivalent to the amount of energy released by burning one ton of crude oil.

    The consumption of energy gaining from coal briquettes accounted for 36.8 percent of the total, reaching 0.107 TOE, followed by wood with 0.069 TOE, electricity with 0.038 TOE, oil products with 0.025 TOE and propane gas with 0.023 TOE.

    The energy consumption for heating took up 50.9 percent of the total, amounting to 0.148 TOE.

    The KEEI said a program for fuel aid to North Korea should be mapped out on the basis of exact data on the energy consumption in the North's private sector.


    source from: http://www.keei.re.kr/main.nsf/index_en.html?open&p=%2Fweb_keei%2Fen_news.nsf%2Fxmlmain2%2FC8637A8F98349DA249257C7B00039088&s=%3FOpenDocument%26menucode%3DES91

    Thursday, February 13, 2014

    World News: Impose 30% cess on diesel cars, panel tells Supreme Court (11 Feb 2014)

    Impose 30% cess on diesel cars, panel tells Supreme Court
    Impose 30% cess on diesel cars, panel tells Supreme Court








    Advocate Harish Salve said subsidized diesel pricewas almost at par with CNG, leading to a massive increase in sale of diesel cars. 
    NEW DELHI: Senior advocate Harish Salvestartled the Supreme Court on Monday by presenting a report which established a direct link between death of 3,000 children annually in Delhi to the increased pollution level attributable mainly to more diesel cars on the roads. 

    Salve said subsidized diesel price was almost at par with CNG, leading to a massive increase in sale of diesel cars. As a result, emissions have directly contributed in taking the ambient air quality in Delhi much beyond the danger level, especially the level of harmful respirable suspended particulate matter (RSPM). 

    The green bench comprising Justices A K Patnaik, S S Nijjar and F M I Kalifulla converted a report of Environment Pollution (Prevention and Control) Authority into an application and issued notices to the Centre, Delhi, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan and asked them to respond within three weeks. 

    The report, submitted through environmentalist and EPCA member Sunita Narain, said CNG was cheaper than diesel by around 46.71% in 2002-03 and the gap widened to 50% between 2004 and 2009. "But in December 2013, the price differential plummeted to 7.35%. After the recent decrease in CNG price, the differential is again about 35%," it said. 

    It recommended a 30% surcharge on cost of diesel cars, drastic increase in registration fee for personal cars and proportional decrease in registration fee for buses to improve ambient air quality of Delhi. 

    The recommendations in the EPCA report submitted by advocate Aparajita Singh included: 

    * Union of India be directed to impose additional 30% environment compensation charge on private diesel cars. Ministry of petroleum and natural gas be directed to invest revenue from this source to produce clean diesel (10 ppm sulphur) to enable nation-wide introduction of Euro V and Euro VI norms and scale up public transport 

    * Delhi government be directed to impose higher taxes on cars and to drastically reduce taxes on buses and public transport vehicles. Other concerned governments Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan in the NCR may also be directed to take similar measures 

    * Delhi government be directed to bring all the 10,000-11,000 buses on roads within a year or face contempt 

    * Delhi government, Municipal Corporation of Delhi and New Delhi Municipal Council be directed to increase parking charges effectively; demarcate legal parking areas and impose higher penalty for illegal parking to cut congestion 

    After reading the radical suggestions against diesel cars, the bench found Narain inside the court and said, "We hope there is no counter attack against her (from lobbies)." 

    source from: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/environment/pollution/Impose-30-cess-on-diesel-cars-panel-tells-Supreme-Court/articleshow/30180391.cms

    Monday, January 27, 2014

    Publication: Shining a Light on Fossil Fuel Subsidies at the WTO: How NGOs can contribute to WTO notification and surveillance (Jan 2014)

    IISD Publications Centre

    Shining a Light on Fossil Fuel Subsidies at the WTO: How NGOs can contribute to WTO notification and surveillance

    » Liesbeth Casier, Robin Fraser, Mark Halle, Robert Wolfe, IISD, 2014.Paper, 29 pages, copyright: IISD
    Fossil fuel subsidies undermine efforts to mitigate climate change and damage the trading system. However, multilateral discussion is hampered by inconsistent definitions and incomplete data. Members do not notify such subsidies as much as they should under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing measures (ASCM), which limits the usefulness of the SCM Committee. The reports of the Trade Policy review mechanism on individual countries and on the trading system draw on a wider range of sources, creating an opportunity for non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to provide the missing data from publicly available sources. We suggest a new template that could be used for such third-party notifications. The objective is to shine a light on all fossil fuel subsidies that cause market distortions, especially trade distortions. The result should be better, more comparable data for the Secretariat, governments, and researchers, providing the basis for better-informed discussion of the incidence of fossil fuel subsidies and rationale for their use.

    PDF
    • Hard copy not available.

    Sunday, September 29, 2013

    Chinese Updates: Beijing Plans Gas-fired Future to Solve Problem (28 Sep 2013)


    Beijing Plans Gas-fired Future to Solve Problem (Sep. 28, 2013)
    By Jiang Xueqing and Wu Wencong (China Daily)

    China will reduce its consumption of coal and gradually increase the use of natural gas during the next few years, according to the Airborne Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan (2013-17), which was released by the State Council on Thursday.

    Total energy consumption is measured in tons of coal, irrespective of the method of generation. In 2011, China's total energy consumption was 3.48 billion metric tons of coal, out of which coal consumption contributed 68.4 percent, while natural gas contributed just 5 percent, according to the National Bureau of Statistics.

    In 2012, the country consumed nearly 2.5 billion tons of coal, more than all other countries combined, according to the Ministry of Environmental Protection.

    The central government has decided to reduce the amount of coal being burned to less than 65 percent of total energy consumption by 2017, while consumption of natural gas will rise to 7.5 percent of the total by 2015.

    The country will employ a number of measures to achieve the reduction in coal use, including increasing the use of non-fossil energy. Coal consumption is expected to decline in areas such as the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei cluster, the Yangtze River Delta region and the Pearl River Delta region, often known as the "three key districts".

    Supplies of natural gas, coal gas and coalbed methane will also be increased. Between 2011 and 2015, 44,000 kilometers of natural gas pipelines will be built, raising the annual receiving capacity of coastal-based liquefied natural gas terminals by more than 50 million tons, according to the 12th Five-Year Plan on Energy Development (2011-15).

    Natural gas pipeline capacity will rise by 150 billion cubic meters by 2015, covering the three key districts, and urban residents will have priority use of the power generated by the newly added supply.

    China's huge coal consumption has resulted in serious air pollution. In Beijing, coal use contributed about 20 percent of a primary pollutant called PM2.5 - particles up to 2.5 microns in diameter, small enough to enter the lungs and blood stream. However, that figure rises to approximately 30 percent if emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide - which can produce PM2.5 during the burning process - are taken into consideration, said Jiang Kejun, senior researcher at the Energy Research Institute of the National Reform and Development Commission.

    About 50 percent of the coal burned in China is used for homes, small-capacity boilers and small businesses, according to Chai Fahe, vice-president of the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences.

    "These pollution sources are always close to the ground, and have very poor pollution-control technologies," he said.

    Chai emphasized the importance of "efficiency control", or the way the coal is burned, in addition to controlling the total amount of fuel being burned.

    Some environmental scientists and industry experts have suggested that the current price of coal - which averaged 565 yuan ($94) to 575 yuan per ton of thermal coal with a calorific value of 5,500 kcal/kg at Qinhuangdao Port by the end of July - is too low and doesn't include the costs of reducing carbon dioxide emissions, controlling air pollution and restoring public health.

    As air pollution has become a serious problem in China, and attracted unwelcome attention worldwide, it's inevitable that coal will be replaced by natural gas. However, the low price means major State-owned oil companies are unenthusiastic about exploring for natural gas, said Yang Fuqiang, senior advisor on climate and energy at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

    For example, it costs 3.5 yuan per cubic meter to import natural gas from Central Asia to gas stations in Beijing, but the stations can only sell the gas to residents at a government-regulated price of 2.05 yuan per cu m. The loss of 1.45 yuan per cu m is covered by government subsidies, according to Yang.

    "Low prices have become a key impediment to the exploration of natural gas. Who would want to invest when it's so difficult to cover the costs?" he said.

    Supplying natural gas requires huge front-end investment for large-scale pipeline construction, and costs will increase as the sources of gas become more diversified, especially with the development of unconventional gases, said Zhou Dadi, vice-chairman of the China Energy Research Society.

    He said the most significant bottleneck to the supply of natural gas is infrastructure construction, which has failed to keep pace with the rising demand for the fuel.

    "This problem has led to a situation where anyone who invests will lose money," said Zhou.
    Chen Weidong, chief energy scientist at the Energy Economics Institute of China National Offshore Oil Corp, said he learned from China National Petroleum Corporation that it loses an average 1.4 yuan on every cubic meter of natural gas it imports from Central Asia and an average 2 yuan on every cubic meter of liquefied natural gas.

    Although imported natural gas loses money and domestically produced natural gas makes minimal profit, oil rakes in huge profits. It costs less than $50 on average to produce a barrel of oil in China, but each barrel sells at $100, said Chen.

    "If the government could raise the price of natural gas to make it profitable, oil companies would increase their efforts to explore for it," he said, adding that China lags behind Western countries in terms of the strategic development of natural gas.

    To ensure supplies of natural gas and promote energy saving and the reduction of emissions, the National Development and Reform Commission increased the wholesale price of natural gas for non-residential users from July 10. At gate stations, where trunk pipelines connect with local gas distribution networks, the average price of natural gas rose by 15 percent to 1.95 yuan per cubic meter.

    However, the operators of some thermal power plants are worried that the costs of raw materials, facilities and operations will increase significantly when they replace their current coal-fired power- and heat-generating units with natural gas-fired ones.

    "It costs 25 yuan per gigajoule to generate heat by burning coal, but almost 70 yuan by burning natural gas. We certainly cannot afford such a big hike in costs. Either the government or the public will have to pay for the transformation," said Du Chengzhang, vice-president of Huaneng Beijing Thermal Power Plant.

    Similarly, the fuel cost of generating electricity will also rise to more than 0.4 yuan per kilowatt-hour from 0.25 yuan, excluding expenditure on water, labor and facilities, he added.

    According to estimates provided by Du and his colleagues, Beijing's municipal government will have to provide the plant with subsidies of 700 to 800 million yuan per year just to keep it running once it switches to gas-fired power generation units.

    "Beginning last year, we paid just 68 percent of the cost of natural gas to Beijing Gas Group. Otherwise, our plant would have closed," he said.

    Last winter, the plant sold heat produced by coal-fired units to the local thermal power group for 33 yuan per gigajoule, while heat produced using gas sold for 79 yuan. When the plant jettisons its coal-fired power generating units in 2016, the price it charges for on-grid electricity will rise to 0.63 yuan per kWh from 0.49 yuan. In the end, the prices of electricity and heating for residential users will rise for sure, he said.

    "Reform of the price of natural gas is not a one-step process. On the contrary, it should move forward in small, quick steps to avoid damaging sustainable consumption," said energy scientist Chen Weidong.

    In the long run, as the pipeline network is expanded to cover more regions, steep rises in the cost of natural gas will cease, according to Zhou of the China Energy Research Society.

    "It's just that for now, the cost must rise to allow industry to develop, but it will reach a balanced stage later on. Then we will be able to discuss the possibility of lowering the cost," he said.

    Zhao Xu contributed to this story.

    Wednesday, September 25, 2013

    New Books: The Energy of Nations Risk Blindness and the Road to Renaissance By Jeremy Leggett (23 Sep 2013)

    The Energy of Nations

    Risk Blindness and the Road to Renaissance

    By Jeremy Leggett

    Routledge – 2014 – 272 pages

    Descriptions:
    Systemic global risks of oil supply, climate shock and financial collapse threaten tomorrow's economies and mean businesses and policy makers face huge challenges in fuelling tomorrow’s world.
    Jeremy Leggett gives a personal testimony of the dangers often ignored and incompletely understood - a journey through the human mind, the institutionalization of denial, and the reasons civilizations fail. It is also an account of tantalizing hope, because mobilizing renewables and redeploying energy funding can soften the crash of modern capitalism and set us on a road to renaissance.

    Contents:
    About the author Publisher’s note about the author’s credentials and motivations Acknowledgements Note on sources and style Prologue 
    PART 1: A HISTORY 
    1. Lies, scaremongering, and affordable oil 
    2. Under the volcano 
    3. Doomed to failure 
    4. Not our responsibility 
    5. The risk of contingency 
    6. The small print 
    7. When the dancing stops 
    8. This House Believes 
    9. They will blame us forever 
    10. As bad as the credit crunch 
    11. You are the flip side of austerity 
    12. Houston, it’s just possible we have a problem 
    13. The anti Oil Shock Response Plan plan 
    14. A bollocks subject 
    15. To the point of being suicidal 
    16. A new era of fossil fuels
    17. More unhinged by the week 
    PART 2: A FUTURE 
    18. What next: the anatomy of the biggest crash
    19. The power of context: energy and security
    20. The choice of roads: people and systems Notes and references

    Thursday, April 11, 2013

    Publication: A Forum for South East Asian Policy-Makers on Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform: Challenges and opportunities – Meeting Report by Kerry Lang (2013)


    IISD Publications Centre

    A Forum for South East Asian Policy-Makers on Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform: Challenges and opportunities – Meeting Report

    » Kerryn Lang, IISD, 2013.
    Paper, 34 pages, copyright: IISD
    To help share experiences on the successes and challenges with fossil-fuel subsidy reform, the IISD's Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) convened a two-day forum for policy-makers in South East Asia, entitled Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform: Challenges and Opportunities. The event brought together high-level policy-makers from Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam, as well as a number of international policy experts from organizations including the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the World Bank (WB).

    Forum discussions focused on key elements of a reform strategy: getting prices right; managing the impacts of reform; and consulting and communicating with stakeholders to build support for reform. The participants also discussed the role of international cooperation in helping to facilitate solutions at the national level. South East Asian countries have a wealth of experience to draw from, with many having partially removed subsidies during peak oil prices in 2008, and most already committed to developing and implementing reform plans.

    Paper