Showing posts with label public engagement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label public engagement. Show all posts

Friday, April 18, 2014

Taiwan News: 環保署限量贈閱「保護環境的公民進行式─環境政策via公民參與」新書 (12 April 2014)

環保署限量贈閱「保護環境的公民進行式─環境政策via公民參與」新書
新聞圖片
        為闡述歷年重大環境政策公民參與機制及成果,環保署編製了「保護環境的公民進行式─環境政策via公民參與」一書,並提供100本書贈閱。

        想瞭解如何參與環境政策制定的民眾可於103年4月30日前,檢附貼足55元掛號郵資A4大小回郵信封1個並寫上收信人地址,寄至環保署綜合計畫處(10042臺北市中正區中華路一段83號7樓)收即可,數量有限,贈完為止。

        早期社會上若干重大環保議題常在各方爭議與民粹氛圍中拍板定案,常見各方各說各話,堅持對自己有利的說詞,放大角度偏頗、與事實落差的資訊影響社會觀瞻甚巨。因此,建立公開透明的機制,呈現事實真相,讓溝通回歸理性、科學根據及政策可行,是首要之務。

        環保署近年積極在「專家審議」和「交付公投」兩個公共政策制定的端點間,尋求可以讓公共政策更為完善的公民參與決策機制,並發展出「公眾參與、專家代理」的公民參與機制;由一開始的公眾倡議,透過辦理公民咖啡館及國際論壇,廣納各界意見與議題並分類彙整問題,以發展關鍵議題,再進入到議題研商,透過全民論壇及召開專家會議等方式,邀請爭議各方專家學者、利害關係人針對各項議題尋求共識,並針對缺乏共識部分賦以關鍵參數設定與模式模擬進行風險評估,若仍無法處理時,再回到價值與利益的取捨,進行風險管理等,均是在環境決策過程中公民可以參與討論方式。

        此次發表新書共收錄17篇案例,說明環保署重大環境決策過程採行公民參與機制及內容,全文共採訪42位學者專家、環保團體代表及機關代表等,分享其親身參與環保議題的經驗及觀點,案例包括備受好評的「垃圾不落地、垃圾費隨袋徵收政策」,由民間環保團體發起的力量,發展至垃圾不落地、隨袋徵收,以及後來創造「零掩埋奇蹟」; 及總統馬英九也親臨超過600人次參加之「全國氣候變遷會議」,聆聽各界回應,在在呈現出公民在參與環保政策時,能夠透過更輕鬆、更理性的方式發聲,從而消弭不同立場多方代表的緊張關係,同時也讓政策的形成,更臻完善與多元。

        本書將在國家書店及五南文化廣場政府出版品展售門市銷售,歡迎民眾前往購買或至環境教育管理資訊系統之環境教育圖書館(網址:http://eeis.epa.gov.tw/lib/)下載閱讀。

source from: 
http://ivy5.epa.gov.tw/enews/fact_Newsdetail.asp?InputTime=1030408175332

Monday, March 17, 2014

Japan News: Public Comments Invited regarding Approval of Type 1 Use Regulation of Living Modified Organisms (3 March 2013)


Public Comments Invited regarding Approval of Type 1 Use Regulation of Living Modified Organisms

Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan
The Ministry of the Environment (MOE) received 2 applications for approval of the conditions (the organism' name, the contents of the use, etc.) concerning the use of Living Modified Organisms submitted by the applicants ("Type 1 Use Regulation") in accordance with the Law Concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity through Regulations on the Use of Living Modified Organisms (Law No. 97 of 2003).
The MOE intends to approve these "Regulations," recognizing that the use of the organisms would have no adverse effects that could pose an unacceptable risk of impairment to the preservation of species or populations of wild fauna or flora, and that no other adverse effect on biological diversity could arise. This judgment was made taking into account the content of consultation with experts.

The MOE invites comments from the public, regarding the approval of the Regulations. Comments will be accepted from February 28 to March 29, 2014.
All procedures related to this invitation for public comments will be conducted in Japanese. Comments need to be submitted in Japanese.

For further information, please visit the Ministry of the Environment web page (in Japanese) (http://www.env.go.jp/info/iken.html). 


sourec from: http://www.env.go.jp/en/headline/headline.php?serial=2064

Thursday, February 20, 2014

Taiwan News: 電動二輪車電池交換新北市示範系統民眾免費試乘活動正式開始 (18 Feb 2014)

電動二輪車電池交換新北市示範系統民眾免費試乘活動正式開始
 
提供單位:行政院環境保護署空保處
發布日期:2014.02.18
新聞圖片
        為讓民眾有機會體驗電動二輪車(包括電動機車、電動自行車及電動輔助自行車)及電池交換系統,環保署與台灣城市動力股份有限公司今日(2月18日)共同辦理「城市動力電動二輪車電池交換新北市示範系統民眾免費試乘啟動典禮」,自今(103)年2月20日起,將於新北市設置10個借用點並提供100輛電動機車供民眾免費試乘體驗。配合本次活動,環保署將進行為期1個月全民發現問題計畫,歡迎試乘民眾踴躍將寶貴的試乘意見提供該署改善參考,一經採納改善,該署將給予300元超商禮券做為獎勵,以確保電池交換系統正式啟用後,系統可穩定正常之運作。

        環保署說明,為了解決電動二輪車充電不方便及續航力不足之問題,該署補助台灣城市動力股份有限公司在新北市設置之30站電池交換系統已經完成建置,即將正式營運。電池交換系統雖已由該公司進行一段時間之測試,但相信還是有改進的空間,因此,該署將進行「電動二輪車電池交換新北市示範系統全民監督計畫(詳附件1)」,歡迎各界隨時針對系統異常狀況或任何改進建議向該署提出,一經採納改善,該署將給予超商禮券做為獎勵。

        此外,為了讓更多民眾有實際體驗電動二輪車及電池交換系統的機會,環保署委託台灣電能車輛發展協會辦理「電池交換營運系統示範推廣專案工作計畫」,自今(103)年2月20日起,將結合現有30站電池交換站裡面的10個站點,設置電動二輪車免費試乘體驗借用點(主要分布於板橋區、新莊區、蘆洲區、樹林區、三重區及五股區,借用要點詳如附件2),第1階段將提供100輛電動機車供民眾免費試乘體驗,並將分3階段將免費試乘體驗電動二輪車數逐步提升至600輛,該計畫將持續電動二輪車免費試乘1年,以利更多民眾有機會親身體驗電動二輪車及電池交換系統,更多資訊可至該署網站查詢(http://mobile.epa.gov.tw/ec/cellexchange.html)。

        環保署表示,除了辦理上述試乘活動外,為鼓勵民眾踴躍購買可交換電池的電動機車,針對前5,000位購買可交換電池電動機車並加入成為城市動力電池交換系統會員之民眾,該署將補助新臺幣1萬元之電池交換費用;另外,未來購買可交換電池電動自行車並加入城市動力電池交換系統之前2,500位消費者,該署將補助新臺幣5,000元之電池交換費用,以協助評估電池交換系統之技術及營運可行性。

        環保署呼籲,電動二輪車完全以電能為動力,相對於傳統汽油引擎機車,具空氣污染物減量效益,該署鼓勵民眾踴躍購買可交換電池的電動二輪車並加入成為電池交換系統之會員,電池將只是電能之載具,民眾無須擔憂交換後電池之品質及性能,除了可以永遠不用負擔後續電池維修更換費用外,還可以像加油一樣,透過交換電池的方式快速地補充電動二輪車的電能,實在是一舉數得,讓我們一起為創造更好的空氣品質而努力。

source from: 

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

China News: Public participation still lacking from China's environmental laws (22 Nov 2013)

Public participation still lacking from China's environmental laws

William J. Schulte


The history of US environmental legislation may offer useful lessons for China’s evolving environmental laws
article image
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is able to revoke permits when petitioning citizens demonstrate that they were issued in violation of the law (Image bySteve Rhodes)
 
Mass environmental protests in China have increased at a rate of around 29% per year since 1996, and by a staggering 120% in 2012. A common complaint is that the legal requirements for transparency and public 
participation in environmental decision-making are often ignored. It has been 10 years since the adoption of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Law, and seven years since the Ministry of Environmental Protection issued its implementing regulations, but many in China still feel the process is opaque.

The history of how public participation developed in the US may offer some insights for China. Some of the first experiments with it occurred during President Roosevelt’s New Deal in the 1920s and serve as a cautionary tale for allowing participation without clear rules or procedures.

The US began to address some of these issues with the Administrative Procedure Act in 1946, which set the foundations for future participation in environmental decision-making. By the 1960s US citizens were beginning to question the wisdom of blindly pursuing rapid development without first considering the potential environmental and public health consequences (much like in China today). By 1969 the United States had adopted the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which was closely followed by groundbreaking laws such as the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA).

The public participation requirements of China’s EIA Law, enacted in 2003, have many similarities with these laws. Both laws, as well as the CAA and CWA, require public notice of environmental reviews, disclosure of environmental review documents, public comment periods, the potential for hearings or meetings to garner public opinion, and substantive responses to comments received, including an explanation of why comments were or were not incorporated into the final review document.
Nevertheless, significant differences remain. NEPA requires the government agency to begin soliciting public opinion on a project at a much earlier stage than required by the EIA Law. This allows significant issues to be brought to light early on in the process and prevent later disputes. Moreover, the public comment period required by the EIA Law is a mere 10 days; NEPA requires a minimum of 45 days to comment on a draft Environmental Impact Statement.  

With respect to document disclosure, the EIA Law and implementing regulations are vague at best - many environmental advocates continue to experience an uphill battle in obtaining the documents they need to meaningfully review the proposals under consideration. NEPA, on the other hand, specifically mandates the notice of public availability of environmental review documents, including any supporting documents used in the review process.  

However, one of the most important differences between these laws is in obtaining a remedy in instances where the responsible entity fails to abide by the requirements for public participation. The EIA Regulations do allow citizens to petition the environmental agency charged with approving the final EIA if they feel that their concerns have not been addressed, but it is unclear what, if anything, the agency is required to do at that point. 
In contrast, the CAA clearly requires the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to revoke permits when petitioning citizens demonstrate that they were issued in violation of the law. For example, in a case I was involved in back in 2009, we discovered that a state agency had issued an air permit to a waste incinerator in Newark, in the state of New Jersey, without following any of the participation requirements. This incinerator was known for its out-of-date pollutant emissions controls, and the community wanted to advocate for technology that would protect their neighbourhood. We petitioned the EPA, which required the state agency to re-issue the permit to allow for public participation. The community was then able, through both written comments and public hearings, to convince the state agency to reach a deal with the facility to install technology for the control of fine particulate matter emissions.

Improving the EIA Process  
 

While the situation may seem grim for Chinese citizens shut out of the public participation process, there are several reasons to hope for improvement. First, the MEP has been taking aggressive measures to discourage EIA consultants from falsifying public participation reports, even going so far as to withdraw their licenses. Nevertheless, some question whether such measures will be sufficient to address the systemic shortcomings of China’s EIA process.  Second, in May it was reported that amendments to the Administrative Litigation Law that may allow NGOs to file lawsuits against environmental agencies for failure to properly implement the EIA law will be presented to the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress this month for review. If adopted, the amendments will presumably enable environmental NGOs to seek relief from the courts when the public’s right to participate is violated.        

Finally, many key figures in the environmental movement in China are continuing to push for more equitable and inclusive environmental decision-making. For example, on August 23 over 20 prominent environmental lawyers, scholars and advocates gathered in Beijing for a symposium to discuss and address these issues. The participants all agreed that China’s EIA process is severely flawed and must be fixed – otherwise, China will continue to see a rapid rise in environmental protests around the country.
source from: https://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/6482-Public-participation-still-lacking-from-China-s-environmental-laws

Friday, September 27, 2013

Publications: Nuclear Energy: Institutional Arrangement and Public Engagement in France by Jacques Foos & Ludivine Gilli (14 Sep 2013)

Nuclear Energy: Institutional Arrangement and Public Engagement in France
By Jacques Foos & Ludivine Gilli

This report mainly focuses on the public engagement process France has gone through while discussing their energy policy, in particular nuclear energy. It sheds light on various important components of the process, for example, availability of independent information, formation of independent agencies and their roles, involvement of independent experts, as well as general public education. Download full report



For more information: http://www.civic-exchange.org/wp/130914frenergypaper_en/

Thursday, September 26, 2013

Hong Kong: Council for Sustainable Development launches public engagement process on municipal solid waste charging (25 Sep 2013)

Council for Sustainable Development launches public engagement process on municipal solid waste charging (with video)

What's New








The following is issued on behalf of the Council for Sustainable Development:

     The Council for Sustainable Development (the Council) today (September 25) launched a public engagement process titled "Waste Reduction by Waste Charging.How to Implement?". This process aims to encourage stakeholders and the general public to participate in the development of feasible mechanisms to implement municipal solid waste (MSW) charging, and to consider the difficulties involved and the related recycling facilities, with a view to reducing community waste at source and promoting the sustainable development of Hong Kong.

     The Chairman of the Council, Mr Bernard Chan, said that around 13,400 tonnes of waste is sent to the landfills each day, of which nearly 67 per cent is MSW, which includes waste from the domestic sector as well as the commercial and industrial (C&I) sectors. In the past 30 years, MSW in Hong Kong has increased by nearly 80 per cent while our population has only increased by 36 per cent.

     "The key to achieving sustainable waste management is waste producers, meaning you and me. Each of us needs to make some lifestyle and behavioural changes to reduce waste," said Mr Chan.

     He also stressed that the ultimate goal of waste charging is not cost recovery, but to establish behavioural changes in people's daily lives through economic incentives. The experience of other jurisdictions shows that MSW charging has been effective in inducing the necessary behavioural changes and encouraging active participation in waste prevention, reuse and recycling to achieve the ultimate objective of waste reduction at source.

     The Invitation for Response (IR) Document issued today provides background information on waste and related issues in Hong Kong, which forms the basis for discussion in the public engagement process. The issues for deliberation focus on four major areas:

* Charging mechanism - to explore different mechanisms in implementing quantity-based waste charging in Hong Kong;
* Coverage of charging scheme - to consider the implementation of charging scheme to all sectors in one go or to different sectors by phases;
* Charging level - to determine a charging level which can be widely accepted by the public and also be able to induce behavioural changes in achieving waste reduction; and
* Waste recycling - to seek views on how to support local waste recycling activities to meet community demand.

     Given that MSW charging covers a wide range of issues, the Council will organise a series of activities, including regional fora and roving exhibitions in the 18 districts, to allow the public and stakeholders to access the relevant information. In addition, more than 90 supporting organisations, including tertiary institutes, public authorities, research institutions, think tanks, green groups, non-governmental organisations, chambers of commerce and professional organisations, etc, have been engaged to help disseminate information about this public engagement process, as well as to create synergy and social cohesion to enhance publicity and participation.

     The IR Document can be downloaded from the Council's dedicated website (www.susdev.org.hk). Members of the public are encouraged to send views to the Council Secretariat (email:comments@susdev.org.hk; mail: Sustainable Development Division, Environment Bureau, 46/F, Revenue Tower, 5 Gloucester Road, Wan Chai, Hong Kong). The public engagement process will run for four months until January 24, 2014.

     MSW charging is an important measure in the Government's overall waste reduction initiatives. In addition, through the implementation of policies and legislation (e.g. various producer responsibility schemes); social mobilisation (e.g. Food Wise Hong Kong), support for the recycling industry and provision of recycling facilities, etc, the Government is contributing large resources to tackle the waste issue. Details are available in the "Hong Kong: Blueprint for Sustainable Use of Resources 2013-2022" (www.enb.gov.hk/en/files/WastePlan-E.pdf).
Ends/Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Issued at HKT 17:31

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Taiwanese Updates: 環保署「列管污染源資料查詢系統」擴增資料,公開民眾上網查詢 (7 May 2013)


環保署「列管污染源資料查詢系統」擴增資料,公開民眾上網查詢
提供單位:行政院環境保護署監資處
發布日期:2013.05.07

環保署「列管污染源資料查詢系統」,即日起擴增提供全民查閱有害空氣污染物檢測結果、各水體污染排放量及違反環保法規之裁處資料(網址:http://prtr.epa.gov.tw)。此項措施環保署已進一步落實政府資訊公開及公眾環境知情權的相關制度。 

        環保署表示,該署特別將許可及申報資料由空、水、廢、毒等各業管單位個別系統匯出後,加以整合成「列管污染源資料查詢系統」,使其具有單一窗口(portal)的效果。公眾藉由此系統,即可同時查閱空氣污染、水污染、廢棄物之排放量及毒化物之製造/輸入量等資料。 

        環保署強調,本次擴增資料之「有害空氣污染物」係依現行空氣污染防制法規定,應定期檢測及申報鉛等重金屬有害空氣污染物之對象及項目,僅有廢棄物焚化處理程序,應定期檢測及申報有害空氣污染物為「鉛」、「鎘」、「汞」之排放濃度檢測結果,上述資料均已納入系統公開;至於「砷」及其他有害空氣污染物之排放量資訊公開,環保署表示將納入後續研議增列公告應定期檢測及申報排放量之空氣污染物種類及對象後,再據以提供。另該署各單位歷年委辦「有害空氣污染物」相關計畫之成果報告,悉已公開在該署「環保專案登錄系統」,可由本網頁超連結查詢。 

        環保署同時表示,擴增資料同時包含「水體污染物排放量」資料已可由列管污染源資料查詢系統頁面超連結直接查閱。各列管污染源除原公開之「放流水排放量」外,另增加該排放量之檢測報告資料。「裁處資料」係彙集各級環保機關最近5年內針對列管污染源所違反環保法規所執行之裁處相關資訊。 

        為了擴大資料運用的效益,環保署未來將列管污染源相關資料,以開放資料(OPEN DATA)方式,提供軟體開發業者及公眾直接以程式讀取,藉以發揮資料加值效益。

For more information: http://ivy5.epa.gov.tw/enews/fact_Newsdetail.asp?InputTime=1020507125515

Saturday, March 30, 2013

South Korean Updates: Jury system for environmental R&D project to be introduced (27 Mar 2013)


MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT REPUBLIC OF KOREA


Jury system for environmental R&D project to be introduced

webmaster
2013.03.27

Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) under the Ministry of Environment announced to introduce the ‘Environmental R&D Project Jury,’ composed of environmental experts, housewives, university students and teachers.

The jury system is of significance in that the public will directly participate in the process of planning, designing and evaluating the development of environmental technology, which used be the task of experts.

The members of jury will join the process from the project-selecting stage, and reflect the public’s voices on various environmental issues. Also, they will participate in public seminars, public hearings as well as evaluation and deliberation of R&D project as monitoring staffs.

KEITI selected 30 members of the environmental R&D project jury and held a kick-off ceremony on March 27.

KEITI expects that the jury system will help reflect the public’s opinion on environmental issues in daily life into R&D policies and accelerate realization of environment welfare.

An official in KEITI said that the environmental R&D project jury will serve as an opportunity to meet the environmental needs of the public regarding Korea’s environmental R&D projects, and will listen attentively to the people’s interest and demand. 

Source: 

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Regional Forum of the Council for Sustainable Development on 11 NOV

Public engagement on Combating Climate Change: Energy Saving and Carbon Emission Reduction in Buildings


Date: 11 Nov 2011 (Fri) 2:15PM
Venue: Sai Tso Wan Neighborhood Community Centre
Address: 1/F, 81 Cha Kwo Ling Road, Kwun Tong, Kowloon

The Council for Sustainable Development (the SDC) has launched a new round of public engagement on Combating Climate Change: Energy Saving and Carbon Emission Reduction in Buildings, which focused strategically on four core building user groups (office, household, retail and catering) to facilitate exchange of ideas on concerns, incentives, and possible action plans for the demand side management in electricity consumption. The SDC has published an Invitation for Response (IR) Document (Download) to impart information and initiate public dialogue for the public engagement process.

Five regional forums will be organised to engage stakeholders from various sectors and the community to join in a dialogue on how to achieve energy saving and enhance energy efficiency in buildings that will lead to combating climate change.

For more info and registration: http://www.susdev.org.hk/en/events.aspx

Monday, September 26, 2011

HK: Public Engagement Process on "Combating Climate Change: Energy Saving and Carbon Emission Reduction in Buildings" by the Council for Sustainable Development

The Council for Sustainable Development is holding 5 regional forums for public engagement on "Combating Climate Change: Energy Saving and Carbon Emission Reduction in Buildings".


  
1st Regional Forum - New Territories East
Date : 16 Aug 2011 (Tue) 2:15PM
Venue : Sha Tin Town Hall (Exhibition Gallery)
Address : 1/F, 1 Yuen Wo Road, Sha Tin, New Territories

2nd Regional Forum - Hong Kong Island

Date : 30 Aug 2011 (Tue) 6:45PM
Venue : Leighton Hill Community Hall
Address : G/F, 133 Wong Nai Chung Road, Happy Valley, Hong Kong


3rd Regional Forum - Kowloon West
Date : 24 Sep 2011 (Sat) 9:15AM
Venue : Mong Kok Community Hall
Address : L2, Mong Kok Complex, 557 Shanghai Street, Mong Kok, Kowloon


4th Regional Forum - New Territories West
Date : 11 Oct 2011 (Tue) 9:15AM 
Venue : Tsuen Wan Town Hall (Exhibition Gallery)
Address : 1/F, 72 Tai Ho Road, Tsuen Wan, New Territories

5th Regional Forum - Kowloon East

Date : 11 Nov 2011 (Fri) 2:15PM
Venue : Sai Tso Wan Neighborhood Community Centre
Address : 1/F, 81 Cha Kwo Ling Road, Kwun Tong, Kowloon


Registration and more info:  http://www.susdev.org.hk/en/home.aspx