Showing posts with label biofuel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label biofuel. Show all posts

Friday, December 13, 2013

Event: Industrial Visit to ASB Bio-diesel Plant (17 Dec 2013)

Industry Visit to ASB Bio-diesel Plant 

Event Date:17 Dec 2013
Event Time:2:00 pm - 4:30 pm
Venue:Tseung Kwan O
Fee:$250.00
Discounts:HKD200 for BEC member; HKD250 for Non-member
Contact:Ms Kitty Wong
Email:kitty@bec.org.hk
Telephone:2784 3924

BEC is organising an Industry Visit to ASB Biodiesel Plant again on 17 December 2013 (Tuesday). The 18,000-square-foot plant, began operating last month, is the largest biodiesel facility in Hong Kong.  It utilizes the city’s densely packed scale to collect used cooking oil in the region and from 4,000 restaurants across town, more than doubling local biodiesel production capacity.  If you missed the last visit in April, you will be able to see more this time.
Rundown
02:00pmGather at BEC Headquarters
02:45pmArrive ASB Bio-diesel Plant in Tseung Kwan O
02:50pmGroup Photo
03:00pmWelcome Presentation by Mr Roberto Vaquez (Chief Technology Officer)
03:20pmQ & A
03:30pmSite Tour lead by ASB Representative
04:30pmEnd of Visit and back to BEC Headquarters

Details
Date17 December 2013
Time02:00pm-04:30pm
FeeHKD 200 for BEC member: HKD 250 for Non member
Assemble locationParking lot, LG/F, 77 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong
RemarksPlease fill in the Registration Form and send to membership@bec.org.hk
 For further information and assistance, you may contact Miss Kitty Wong at 2784-3924 or kitty@bec.org.hk
- See more at: http://bec.org.hk/events-current/industry-visit-to-asb-bio-diesel-plant#sthash.IkOjHcIA.dpuf


Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Publication: Biofuels - At What Cost? A review of costs and benefits of U.K. biofuel policies (13 Oct 2013)

Biofuels - At What Cost? A review of costs and benefits of U.K. biofuel policies

» Christopher Charles, Richard BridleTom Moerenhout, IISD, 2013.Paper, 51 pages, copyright: IISD
This report evaluates some of the principal issues associated with the U.K.'s biofuel industry, including support policies, employment creation, emissions abatement, and the role of biofuels and other renewable technologies in meeting EU renewable energy targets. It assesses the costs and benefits of the U.K.’s policies in meeting the objectives that EU member states have set out to achieve, including increased energy security, improvements in environmental performance and the generation of additional economic value. The report finds:

Monday, October 21, 2013

Publication: Biofuels At What Cost? A review of costs and benefits of Spain's biofuel policies (13 Oct 2013)

IISD Publications Centre

Biofuels At What Cost? A review of costs and benefits of Spain's biofuel policies

» Christopher Charles, Alicia Natalia Zamudio TrigoTom Moerenhout, 2013.Paper, 60 pages
This report evaluates some of the principal issues associated with Spain’s biofuels industry, support policies, employment creation, emission abatement and the role of biofuels and other renewable transport technologies in meeting EU renewable energy targets. The report assesses the costs and benefits of Spain’s policies in meeting the objectives that EU member states have set out to achieve—increased energy security, improvements in environmental performance and the generation of additional economic value. The report finds:
  1. Support to Spain’s biofuel industry in 2011 was estimated at between €213 million and €237 million for ethanol and from €955 million to €1,002 million for biodiesel.
  2. 2011 carbon abatement costs for ethanol were €488 per tonne CO2 avoided and €194 per tonne for non-land based biodiesel. Conventional biodiesel was responsible for net emissions increases and no abatement cost can be calculated.
  3. There is a wide range for the number of direct and indirect jobs created by the Spanish biofuels sector estimated at between 3,797 and 12,055 in 2011. Job estimates are based on a variety of job-counting approaches used in measuring biofuel and renewable energy jobs reflecting the challenges in assessing the numbers and quality of sectorial jobs.
  4. More than 75 per cent of biodiesel consumed in Spain was imported in 2011. Around 95 per cent of biodiesel feedstock was imported with 90 per cent coming from Argentinian soy and Indonesian palm oil. Spain also imported 73 per cent of the feedstock used in ethanol production eroding energy security benefits due to a high reliance on foreign imports.
A number of policy recommendations are provided to promote the sustainability and effectiveness of Spain’s biofuel policies.

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Publication: Biofuels—At What Cost? A review of costs and benefits of EU biofuel policies by Chris Charles, Ivetta Gerasimchuk, Richard Bridle, Tom Moerenhout, Elisa Asmelash, Tara Laan (17 Apr 2013)

IISD Publications Centre

Biofuels—At What Cost? A review of costs and benefits of EU biofuel policies

» Chris CharlesIvetta GerasimchukRichard BridleTom Moerenhout, Elisa Asmelash, Tara Laan, IISD, 2013.Paper, 129 pages, copyright: IISD
BiofuelsAt What Cost? A review of costs and benefits of EU biofuel policies analyzes a range of costs and benefits associated with European Union (EU) conventional biofuel policies. The study provides a comprehensive overview of economic and non-economic costs and benefits of the EU, quantifying them where possible using estimates available from public accounts, state-of-the-art literature and author calculations. The paper identifies the main cost of the industry as subsidy schemes, which in 2011 were estimated to be EUR 9.3 – 10.7 billion. The study examines the key benefits generated by the industry, including rural development, greenhouse gas emissions reductions, and improved energy security, concluding that the social benefits of EU biofuel policies in meeting these policy objectives has, in many instances, been marginal, unclear, or in need of greater monitoring and elaboration. The European Union’s proposed tightening of the current emission standard for passenger vehicles is discussed as an alternative, viable low-cost policy measure to achieve the public policy objectives for which biofuels are subsidized. The report provides recommendations to EU policy-makers on reforming subsidy policies and improving data recording in order to enhance the policy formulation process.
Accompanying this report is a Technical Annex that contains supporting research material and data.





















Friday, December 14, 2012

Vietnamese Updates: ADB-Funded Biogas Plants to Tackle Viet Nam's Growing Rural Waste Threat (13 Dec 2012)

ADB-Funded Biogas Plants to Tackle Viet Nam's Growing Rural Waste Threat

Converting this waste into biogas and fertilizer will help prevent disease outbreaks, cut harmful gas emissions, lower costs for farmers and provide new supplies of clean energy.

MANILA, PHILIPPINES – The Asian Development Bank (ADB) will provide $74 million to fund thousands of biogas plants across Viet Nam to help reduce the country’s mounting piles of rural waste, which are harming the environment and endangering health.

“A boom in livestock production has seen a sharp rise in the discharge of untreated waste, which has serious consequences for health and the environment,” said Agustina Musa, Financial Management Specialist in ADB’s Southeast Asia Department. “Converting this waste into biogas and fertilizer will help prevent disease outbreaks, cut harmful gas emissions, lower costs for farmers and provide new supplies of clean energy.”

The Low Carbon Agricultural Support Project will process agricultural and rural household waste into biogas and bio-slurry, a clean organic fertilizer. Data from a similar ADB project in the People’s Republic of China shows that biogas plant investments lower energy costs, raise organic fertilizer use, and boost household incomes annually by about 15%. The project is expected to reduce carbon dioxide equivalent emissions of 150,000 tons annually.

More than 36,000 small, medium and large-sized biogas plants are expected to be built and the project will also raise awareness about environmentally-safe, climate-friendly waste management practices using commune pilot demonstrations, short training courses, study tours, radio and television programs. and information materials.

The project will also provide credit lines through financial intermediaries, which will allow farmers and livestock enterprises to access financing to establish and improve biogas infrastructure. It will also provide incentives to biogas stakeholders for the development of carbon markets, aid government efforts to access markets for carbon credits, and support greater private sector involvement in the management of the industry.

The project will run for six years with an expected completion date of December 2018. ADB’s loan is from its concessional Asian Development Fund, with the Government of Viet Nam and state-owned financial firms contributing a combined $10 million.

For more information about the Low Carbon Agricultural Support Project:
http://www.adb.org/projects/45406-001/details

News source:
http://www.adb.org/news/viet-nam/adb-funded-biogas-plants-tackle-viet-nams-growing-rural-waste-threat

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Publications: Cultivating Governance: Cautionary tales for biofuel policy reformers by IISD Publications Centre (5 Dec 2012)


IISD Publications Centre


Cultivating Governance: Cautionary tales for biofuel policy reformers


» Ivetta GerasimchukRichard BridleChris Charles, Tom Moerenhout, IISD, 2012.Paper, 22 pages, copyright: IISD
The policy brief analyzes the current developments around the emerging U-turns on government support to biofuels internationally. Based on desk research as well as interviews with stakeholders, the policy brief seeks to provide guidance for biofuel policy reformers on good governance principles in view of pressures from different interest groups.
The brief's key messages are universal, but may be of special relevance to policy-makers in the EU in light of the European Commission's proposal of October 17, 2012 to limit the use of food-based biofuels to 5 per cent until 2020 in contributing to the 10 per cent target of renewable energy in transport.

Key messages of the policy brief are:

  • Biofuel policies have been haunted by mismatches between their stated aims (climate change mitigation, innovative "green" development and energy security) and "Realpolitik" objectives (supporting agricultural constituencies). Such mismatches should be avoided. In particular, resorting to allegedly environmental causes for protection of national agriculture is at odds with the principles of the World Trade Organization (WTO).
  • In addressing the frequently cited objectives of government support to biofuels, preference over subsidies should be given to first-best (i.e., market-based) solutions, including, but not limited to, phasing out support to fossil fuels and pricing carbon effectively through carbon caps and/or taxes.
  • Governments need to assure good governance and base their decisions on evidence from independent research. In cases of uncertainty about biofuels' performance, especially with respect to indirect land use change and the food vs. fuel debate, decisions should be guided by the Precautionary Principle.
  • Governments should phase out support to biofuels that a) compete with food or animal-feed uses for the same feedstock crops and/or b) have negative impacts on the environment.

Paper